Skip to main content

Review #10: Sherlock Holmes

Given his return to power it wasn't that surprising when it was announced that Robert Downey Jr. would be playing Arthur Conan Doyle's immortal detective. You could perhaps say it was elementary (sorry). 

It was a slight surpise however to find Guy Ritchie at the directors chair, what with the director having being in a bit slump for some time but he does a good job - thinking about it now he mirrors RDJ in Ironman: being an unlikely choice due to a lack of success only to deliver the goods. 

Even more surprising was Jude Law being in the position of sidekick, failures such as "Sleuth" and "Repo Men" have diminished Laws star power but he too is on form here.

The chemistry between the two leads is absolutely electric, they look like they are having real fun and just enjoy being around each other which translates perfectly, it's good fun to watch them having fun. Their relationship is convincing and entertaining, providing the comedy that works. RDJ's Holmes is an all seeing intellectual, being two steps ahead of everyone, understanding everything except social conventions and women with Law being his capable straight man, being just a step behind Holmes.

The action is good, with a grubby boxing match in the mud being the most obvious Ritchie element and a middle act fight of Holmes+Watson vs Meat+Veg being childishly fun while the finale atop a incomplete London Tower Bridge is suitably epic. Furthermore Ritchies fast cuts and pacing compliment this Holmes' concentration and movement.

The London created by Ritchie is all grubby and slightly steampunk. Thinking about it is likely quite an accurate portrayal of the time

Mark Strong is more than adequate as the sinister Lord Blackwood however the character is not as dimensional as other villains recent years have delivered (were looking at you Joker). Nor is he the Holmes villain we are all eager to see, with the foreshadowing to Moriarty setting the stage for their eventual showdown.

Weaker parts in an otherwise strong escapade include Rachel McAdams' Irene Adler, who although a challenge to Holmes that is shown to be capable of handling herself actually has very little to do and degenerates into a damsel type weakness to be used against our hero later in the story.

The examples of movie physics are also a bit irritating: the electric stick sending thugs flying and the anchor in the docks hurtling around stand out, especially when this series is usually rather reality based but this is a buddy romp reimagining so this can be overlooked.

Also the pseudo-magicscience of Blackwoods powers is hardly the work of a detective, being almost as obvious as the studio interference - which results in the comedy that doesn't work, such as the dog farting.

Also just to nit-pick, was running hot water around in this period?

To summarise, solid good fun, Holmes and Watson are a dynamic duo, Ritchie busts his slump and will better this outing in the future due to not being weighed down by world building responsibilities although it is weighed down by a formulaic structure and unnecessary characters.

4

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review #6: Skyfall

Where to begin with the latest Bond outing; Skyfall? Theres quite a lot if were going to be honest and not be lazy like I was with my review of "The Avengers". So first off, lets start with the man himself. Because of MGM's financial state it was 4 years in between Craig's previous and recent adventures as 007. Do you remember in 2006 when the pitch for Casino Royale was to show a "young Bond": no Q, Moneypenny, just been given the license to kill. It's been that long that now members of MI6 such as Ralph Fiennes' Mallory are questioning whether Bond is up to the challenge anymore - "its a young mans game." Craig is impressive in this entry: frustrated by younger colleagues (Q, Eve), how his method of espionage is becoming outdated and by his own body - he's older, slower, weaker; Bond's out to prove himself . Fortunately Craig delivers, he more than proves himself (however I do hope that Craig's contracted 2 more Bond's ...

Review #5: Revolutionary Road

Sam Mendes must be a bit of an odd guy. Don't get me wrong American Beauty is brilliant, Jarhead is great and I'm unbelievably excited for Skyfall but the guy must be a little strange. I say this because he directed "Revolutionary Road" which his (then) wife Kate Winslet is (again) in love with Leo DiCaprio. Can't help but think the sex scene in the kitchen might of been tense. Then again were all professionals here. Kate and Leo's chemistry hasn't diminished since Titanic, even when arguing they are enjoyable, they light up the screen; even with the dark handling of the subject matter. They are also framed impeccably well by Mendes, however it doesn't feel like his direction entriely contributes to the film - the camera never feels like it's in a wrong position but Revolutionary Road is definitely going to be receiving awards for its cast, sadly Mendes' direction plays second fiddle. The rest of the cast are also on form, Kathy Bates and M...

Review #11: The Incredibles

Okay yeah I've done it againn. I said I'd start taking this blog seriously with the new year and that hasn't happened in the slightest. Good intentions will only get you so far, I'm a slacker I'll admit it, a product of a generation that wants to get as far as possible whilst doing as little as possible. But that stops now. And in a months time if I've done this again then I'll take this blog down since there is no point really. Anyway moving onto reviews. Pixar's The Incredibles is a wonderful film. Thats the problem with reviewing wonderful films I'm going to give this film a 5 out of 5 and everybody knows it. Okay sure perhaps it doesn't deliver in the big emotional stakes as much as other Pixar smash hits such as Wall-E, Up or Toy Story 3 but it delivers and then some in terms of entertainment, spectacle, comedy, characterisation and action. Director Brad Bird has admitted that he modelled the personalities of the Parr family on stock ste...